Western Region Construction Consultancy
A structural consultancy in Klaipėda that has drawn consistent criticism for report quality and client communication.
What customers love
- No consistent praise found in available reviews
- No positive attributes mentioned by reviewers
- No strengths identified across submitted feedback
Worth noting
- Conclusions deemed legally unusable and too superficial by lawyers
- 1800 EUR paid upfront with no willingness to revise or clarify work
Best for
Customers should exercise caution before engaging this firm for legal or insurance purposes.
What reviewers warned about
Issues raised independently by two or more reviewers of Western Region Construction Consultancy, with what to ask before you hire. These are reports by customers, not findings by Veted.
Expert report failed to answer client's specific questions
Serious2 reviewers, 2026Client paid €1,800 for fire damage assessment and chimney remodeling estimate. When they requested clarification of conclusions and detailed calculations, the firm did not respond. A lawyer subsequently stated the report was unusable because it failed to address the questions that needed answering.
Ask before you hire: Request samples of previous fire damage assessments and expert reports; ask how they ensure conclusions address client's specific questions.
Summarised from public customer reviews. Reports reflect individual experiences at the time they were written and may since have been resolved. Own this business? Respond to these reports.
Attribute scores
Recent reviews
Very bad
I do not recommend it. It cost a lot, but the benefit is zero. Even the lawyer did not talk about supplementing the report. Now it is done very superficially
I DO NOT RECOMMEND! After the fire, I contacted this company, more precisely Arturas Sabeckis, to determine the cause of the fire, draw up a damage estimate, an estimate for chimney remodeling and provide detailed conclusions. They promised to do the work within a week, but it took much longer, but this would be a trifle compared to the content of the conclusions we received. We immediately asked to clarify the conclusions, detail the calculations, etc. They did not even start talking. When we handed it over to the lawyer, the lawyer immediately said that such conclusions can be thrown in the trash, because they do not answer the questions that need to be answered at all. Arrogance and complete non-listening are all you can expect. 1800 euros was paid in advance, so after that nothing is interesting.